gsardin@intercom.es
N. Segroeg, Editor
segroeg@altavista.net
Copyright © 1996, All
Rights Reserved
Legal Deposit: B-37-342-98
ISBN: 84-605-8006-7
An alternative approach to the Standard Model is proposed, being motivated by the increasing difficulties, theoretical and experimental, encountered by this model which furthermore fails to be unitary. In particular, the conceptual uneasiness generated by the excessive multiplicity of fundamental elements of the Quark Model, 36 different quarks whose cohesion needs 8 different types of gluons, has logically led some physicists to propose a variety of quark substructures in an effort to reach unity. However these hazardous attempts will without any doubt guide particle physics to fall into an abyss, in view of the already too highly dubious content of QCD. In order to avoid the forward escape corresponding to the attribution of a substructure to quarks and to stand away from the conceptual strangling to which the Standard model has led, we have instead opted for different fundamentals. These, in contrast to those of the Standard Model, are extremely simple and based on the assumption of a single fundamental corpuscle, of dual manifestation as corpuscle and anticorpuscle, to which is always associated an orbital that determines the structure of particles. In such a frame particles differentiate through the diversity of quantum states of their structuring orbital, in contrast to the strategy used by the Standard Model based instead on particles multiplicity of composition through the variety of quarks content, furthermore limited to hadrons. Instead the orbital conception of particles is unitary, unifying all of them as well as their interactions. As an outstanding feature, nuclear forces derive from the neutron orbital structure, based on a proton core and a shell, shell which constitutes the cohesive element of nuclear structure.
The competence of the scientific hierarchy is inversely proportional to the time it takes to become aware of its errors.
Its intellectual integrity is inversely proportional
to the time it takes to gather the will to correct them.
***
The construct of a unitary conception of elementary
particles, fields and free space implies coming up with a single composition,
appealing thus to a single fundamental element, and to give account
for diversity through a multiplicity of structural quantum
states.
Preface
Part
I: CONCEPTUAL FUNDAMENTALS
I. Introduction
II. Fundamentals
III. Archetypical Orbital Systems
IV. Nuclear Fusion and Radioactivity
V. Nature and Saturation of Nuclear Forces
V.1. Within Isotone Families
V.2. Within Isobar Families
V.3. Within Isotope Families
V.4. Withinn Heavy Nuclides
VI. Comments
VII. Conclusion
Part II: DEVELOPMENTS
I. Orbital Conception of Elementary
Particles
II. Orbital Structure of Elementary Particles
III. Universe Asymmetrical Composition
IV. Orbital Structure and Nuclear Forces
V. Hydrogen Fusion
VI. Orbital Nature of Elementary Particles
VII. Orbital Structure of the Neutron, Deuteron and Helion3
IX. Cohesive Capacity of the Shell of H3 and He3
X. Orbital Structure of Neutral Baryons
XI. Orbital Structure of Baryons
XII. Fundamentals of the Orbital Mechanics of Particles Structure: Quantum Orbital Dynamics (QOD)
XIII. Neutron Structure and its Classical Radius
XIV. Nature of the Electron Mass
XVI. Nature of the Muon Mass
XVII. Unification of the Electron and the Proton
XVIII. Elementary Particles Unitary Structural System
XIX. The Q charge of the Hydrogen Atom
XX. Diagram of the Creation Process of Elementary Particles
XXI. Neutron and Lambda Disintegration
XXII. Nature of Particles Mass and Gravitational Field
XXIII. Quantization of the Structuring Orbital of Elementary Particles
Part III: NOVEL SCIENTIFIC AIMS
I. Novel Scientific Aims
II. Aether or the Primordial Matrix
III. Elementary Particles as Quantized Excited States of
the Aether
IV. The Aetheron and the Photon
V. The Aetheron vs. Conservation Law of Corpuscles
VI. Quantization and Energy of Free space